🔗 Share this article Russia Seeks Substantial Amount in Damages from Euroclear over Seized Funds The Russian central bank has announced it is claiming compensation valued at $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This action is a direct warning by the Kremlin regarding plans to utilize frozen Russian state assets to support Ukraine. The Legal Claim According to accounts in local state media, the monetary authority filed a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion demand. European Union officials are set to determine in the coming days regarding a plan to leverage around €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. This scheme entails providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its military and financial stability. The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the main keeper for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth. Dispute on Ownership European Union authorities have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue is based on the fact that ownership of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, even though it was immobilized in European countries following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. The Russian government, in contrast, has called any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have warned of reciprocal measures, such as confiscating European corporate assets within Russia. The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a prominent role in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its funds. He warned that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal. Geopolitical Maneuvering With statements interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the proposal as "a severe attack on property rights and the international reserves system established by the United States." Euroclear refused to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. It has in the past noted it is facing more than 100 lawsuits in Russian courts. Legal Hurdles Ahead While courts in EU countries are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, analysts anticipate Moscow to seek enforcement in nations with stronger relations to the Kremlin. "The Bank of Russia could try to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, provided that relevant assets can be located," commented a legal expert from an NSP law firm. EU Countermeasures EU officials indicated they are working on steps to discourage other nations from assisting any Russian lawsuits against EU companies. They are also crafting protections to shield EU member states with assets in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation." The Proposed Loan Mechanism According to the detailed plan, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would stay untouched. Kyiv would solely be obligated to repay the money if and when Russia consented to pay compensation for the vast damage caused during the nearly four-year war. Other Funding Ideas The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an different method for financing Ukraine. This entails joint EU borrowing to secure a loan, backed by unused funds within the European budget. Such a proposal, however, demands full agreement among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has already expressed its opposition. Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, said the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it doesn't come from our public funds, which is equally important," she remarked. "Furthermore, it sends a powerful message that if you cause all this destruction to another country, you must pay for the rebuilding."